Feedback How to Analyze a Philosophical Essay In many of your philosophy classes you will be asked to write a critical analysis of a philosophical essay.
Feedback How to Analyze a Philosophical Essay In many of your philosophy classes you will be asked to write a critical analysis of a philosophical essay. This assignment has a specific form which is common to most classes.
This document contains the basic instructions for writing such an analysis, though the specifics may vary depending on the class or the instructor.
At the end of this document you will find a list of analyses that satisfy the requirements below. The first thing you need to do is read the assigned article several times. When you think you understand it, select an aspect of the article that you find particularly interesting, troubling, exciting, confusing, or problematic.
By an aspect of the article, I do not mean a particular section of it; I mean a claim or set of claims to which the author is committed, either by explicitly arguing for them, or implicitly presupposing them.
Writing Style Your analysis should be concise and thorough. Absolutely do not engage in: It should be free of spelling, grammatical and structural errors. It is important to understand that any essay that begins with such errors is likely to be dismissed by the reader and hence by your instructor as an incompetent piece of work.
In general, spelling errors and grammatical errors, run-on and convoluted sentence structure, and long paragraphs with multiple topics make it very difficult to credit quality of thought.
Quotations All direct quotations must, of course, be identified as such with a citation. As a rule, one should only quote an author if the precise way in which he or she has chosen to express something figures essentially into your critique.
Never simply substitute a quotation for your own summary of what the author is saying.
Your Audience Even though your primary reader is your instructor, who will have read the article in question, you should approach this assignment as if you intend to publish it in a philosophy journal.
While you are not accountable for summarizing the entire article see summary section belowyou must always refrain from allusions that would only be comprehensible to someone who has read the article. Introduction Critique Conclusion optional in that order.
Be sure to identify each section. The critical part of your analysis should demonstrate an awareness of other relevant readings covered in class. You should be careful to note when you are reproducing criticisms that are made by others authors we have read. You should be careful to include or consider important criticisms made by other authors when they are clearly relevant to your own concerns.
Follow these specific instructions for each section to the letter. Introduction This section must accomplish the following tasks in the following order. I prefer that you devote a single short paragraph to each task. Identify the article, and describe in one or two sentences what problem s it addresses and what view s it defends.
State precisely which aspect s of the article your analysis will address and precisely what you intend to accomplish.
Rather, it must be a very specific and concise statement of the case you intend to make, and the basic considerations you intend to employ in making it. Summary The rules for constructing a summary are as follows: For the most part, you should summarize only those aspects of the article that are relevant to your critique.
Do not produce an unnecessarily lengthy or detailed summary. As a general rule of thumb,the summary and critique will usually be roughly equal in length.
This restriction does not prevent you from expressing some uncertainty about what the author is saying, however. The summary should be organized logically, not chronologically.
Each paragraph in the summary will ordinarily present argument s the author makes in support of a particular position.
A summary that goes something like: Critique Your critique should be organized in a way that reflects the structure of your summary. This is easy to do since you have selected for summary only those aspects of the article about which you have something to say.
Be sure your critique obeys the rules laid out in the Writing Style section above. Here are three different approaches to doing a critique. Define your project in terms of arguments and views that you find problematic. Define your project in terms of arguments and views that you basically agree with.
Define your project in terms of arguments and views that you find interesting, but which you are currently disinclined to either fully accept of fully reject.
Carefully articulate the strongest considerations in favor of the view and the strongest considerations against the views. Then carefully explain why you remain undecided and indicate precisely what sort of information or arguments would be required for you to be able to make up your mind.View Essay - How to Write Philosophy Essays-2 from PHILOSOPHY at Western University.
How to Write a Philosophy Essay By: David Hakim Introduction Should be roughly sentences Two parts: A. A Brief Guide to Writing the Philosophy Paper The Challenges of Philosophical Writing The aim of the assignments in your philosophy classes is to get you doing philosophy.
But what is philosophy, your thesis clearly and concisely in your introduction so that your reader understands what your paper sets out to achieve. Get to the point. May 30, · Introductions matter, and I have designed this article to provide a framework for how to write essay introductions that are clear, strong and engaging.
The concepts are applicable to the essays of middle school and high school writing all the way up through writing in college and graduate regardbouddhiste.coms: Nov 15, · Write your introduction after you write your essay.
Some writers prefer to write the body of the essay first, then go back and write the introduction. It's easier to present a summary of your essay when you've already written it%(27).
a foundation upon which we will build a framework for you on how to write a philosophy essay in clear, concise, critical, and convincing language.
This framework consists of eight simple steps that will guide your writing process. Speciﬁcally, we will examine how to: 1. Know your audience 2.
Organize your thoughts 3. Structure your essay 4. Writing it out like this is probably overkill. The important thing is that I identified the key premises and the conclusion. I tell you exactly where I disagree with Frege's argument.